A publication of the National Electronics Manufacturing Center of Excellence
February 2010
Go to the ACI website Go to the EMPF website

In This EMPFasis Issue

Ceramic to Plastic Packaging

 

Ask the EMPF Helpline!

 

Winning the Board Testing Task: Flying Probe versus Bed of Nails

 

Tech Tips: Thermal Profiling for Reflow

 

Manufacturer’s Corner: RMD Instruments

 

Design of Experimentation for Affordability

 

EMTC Online Registration

 

Upcoming Training Center Courses




Discount pricing on IPC training course J-STD-001, 610, 600, 7711, 7712

ACI Technologies Inc.
One International Plaza
Suite 600
Philadelphia, PA 19113
(610) 362-1200
FAX: (610) 362-1290
HELPLINE: (610) 362-1320
WEBSITE: www.empf.org
www.aciusa.org

 



Michael D. Frederickson
EMPF Director

Barry Thaler, PhD.
bthaler@aciusa.org
Empfasis Technical Editor

Paul Bratt
pbratt@aciusa.org
Empfasis Editor

IAB
Industrial Advisory Board
Gerald R. Aschoff, The Boeing Company
Dennis M. Kox, Raytheon
Gregory X. Krieger, BAE Systems
Edward A. Morris, Lockheed Martin
Jane Krueger , Rockwell Collins
Gary Kirchner, Honeywell
Andrew Paradise, Northrop Grumman
Richard Kidwell , ITT Industries


title

Recently, a customer called the EMPF Helpline seeking advice for cleaning no-clean fluxes prior to applying a conformal coating.

The customer’s assemblies were manufactured with a no-clean rosin based solder paste (ROL0) and were cleaned with an isopropyl alcohol (IPA) wash. After cleaning, a white residue was sometimes found in areas with high paste concentrations and was interfering with the adhesion of the conformal coating (Figure 2-1).


For conformal coatings to adhere properly, the printed circuit board (PCB) surface must be clean of fluxes and other residues. In addition, ionic contamination left by flux residues can lead to corrosion and dendrite growth, two common causes of electronic opens and shorts. Other residues can lead to unwanted impedance and physical interference with moving parts.
A conformal coating is only effective at preventing dendritic growth and corrosion if there are no ionic residues or active flux residues trapped under the coating. Since conformal coatings slowly absorb moisture, any residues that are present under the coating can facilitate the migration of metallic ions and affect PCB performance. Thus, all residues must be removed from the assembly before applying the conformal coating.

“No-clean” fluxes are also referred to as “low solid” or “low residue” fluxes. These fluxes are designed to leave a benign nonconductive and non-moisture absorbing residue behind, but only if properly heat activated. They are typically Rosin (RO) or Resin (RE) flux types with low (L) or moderate (M) activity levels. It is important to remember that “no clean” actually refers to the electronics manufacturing process where low solid fluxes are used. These electronic assemblies may or may not be cleaned.

No-clean fluxes are typically not very soluble in deionized (DI) water and IPA wash solutions since they are designed to leave behind non-moisture absorbing residues. The white residue left after cleaning a no-clean flux with IPA is essentially dehydrated flux. This white residue has the potential to be conductive and absorb moisture. The recommended cleaning method for no-clean fluxes is the use of saponifier at a 60ºC temperature and rinsing with plenty of low pressure steam and DI water. A saponifier is a soap ingredient which reacts
with water to split insoluble rosin or resin esters into water soluble salts.

The EMPF generally recommends using a flux chemistry other than “no-clean” when the assembly will be cleaned. If a no-clean flux must be cleaned with IPA, the best advice is to add mechanical scrubbing to the cleaning process. Typically, this means the use of a brush and manual scrubbing. Since IPA is such a poor solvent of rosin, a better plan would be to use a solvent based aerosol cleaner. Some brands include Micro Care, 3M, Tech Spray, and Chemtronics. Some technicians prefer aerosol cleaners with “trigger grip” attachments that greatly reduce the amount of solvent required. Each specific flux has some cleaners that work best with them. The EMPF advises clients to call their local distributor for some samples and try each on the specific material that requires cleaning, then specify the use of the best material for the job.

The EMPF offers various analytical techniques (Resistivity of Solvent Extract (ROSE) Test, Ion Chromatography, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Surface Insulation Resistance) to determine the root cause of contaminant problems and to evaluate the effects of process or materials changes on cleanliness. More information about these services can be found on the EMPF web site, http://www.empf.org or by calling the EMPF technical staff at 610.362.1320.

References:
McLaughlin, Malcolm C., and Alan S. Zisman. Aqueous Cleaning Handbook. 3rd Edition. AI Technical Communications. 2002.

Munson, Terry. “Can You Clean a No-Clean Assembly?” Circuits Assembly. Jan. 2003.
<http://www.residues.com/resources_casestudies.html>.

Munson, Terry. “Is White Residue a Reliability Risk?” Circuits Assembly. Jul. 2004.
<http://www.residues.com/resources_casestudies.html>.

Munson, Terry. “White Residues: Are They or Aren’t They?” Circuits Assembly. Jan. 2006.
<http://www.residues.com/resources_casestudies.html>.

 


The EMPF is a U.S. Navy-sponsored National Electronics Manufacturing Center of Excellence focused on the development,
application, and transfer of new electronics manufacturing technology by partnering with industry,
academia, and government centers and laboratories in the U.S

[site map]