![]() |
| A publication of the National Electronics Manufacturing Center of Excellence | April 2005 |
Material issues The components and board will be more sensitive to heat-related soldering damage with lead free solders than with SnPb solders. It has been shown that components will increase their moisture resistance sensitivity by two levels, based on IPC-J-STD-020 testing specifications. The higher lead free soldering temperatures can result in an increase in board delamination, measling, and blistering. For example, measling bridging over 50% of the span between conductors is a defect, in accordance to IPC J-STD-001. Board failure descriptions can be found in the IPC J-STD-001D, Appendix C and in the IPC A-610D documents. To prevent these types of failures, it is recommended that the components and boards be baked prior to soldering to remove any absorbed moisture. Board finishes should not be a factor in performing hand soldering. However, OSP board finishes are prone to developing a halo around the solder joint. Because lead free solders do not wet as well, this halo effect is more prominent with lead free than with SnPb solders. Component manufacturers are beginning to provide their hardware with lead free alternative finishes. Some of the available finishes include:
For a specific component, manufacturers will not provide multiple component finishes. Market demand will determine the finish of choice. The EMPF found no process incompatibilities and no reliability issues between the various lead free solders and lead free board finishes. These findings are consistent with other lead free soldering industrial studies. However, as the technology matures, there are possible incompatibilities between lead free component finishes and SnPb solders. This is known as “backwards compatibility”. For example, tin-finished components represent a major reliability concern to some electronics manufacturers, because they are susceptible to tin whiskers, which can cause electrical system failures. Depending upon the size of the board and the board’s thermal mass, operators may wish to use a digitally-controlled hot plate to preheat the board prior to soldering. This practice is performed with SnPb solders and should continue with lead free solders. The higher soldering temperatures necessitate using a digitally-controlled hot plate. Preheating the board will reduce the thermal gradients within the board during the hand soldering process. |
||
Hand soldering process issues Due to the higher soldering temperatures, the iron must be kept clean and fully coated with the solder alloy; otherwise, oxidation of the soldering iron tip can occur. Lead free solders are more sensitive to the effects of a dirty soldering iron. Also due to the higher soldering temperatures, the soldering iron must be removed more quickly. Lead free solders and SnPb solders have different cooling rates and cooling characteristics. Icicles will be created if the soldering iron is removed too slowly. The size and frequency of solder icicles is dependent upon the alloy used and the soldering iron temperature setting. Quick removal of the solder iron also prevents disturbance of the solder joint and pads on the board. Lifted pads and fillets are more prominent with lead free solders. To avoid contamination of solder joints, solder tips which are used with lead free alloys must be kept separate from those used with SnPb. There is some evidence that lead free solders joints contaminated with Pb are not as reliable as uncontaminated lead free solder joints. To ensure adequate heat transfer, operators must select an appropriate solder tip and dwell time. A solder tip which is too small will not provide sufficient heat transfer. In addition, a longer dwell time (the time the soldering iron is in contact with the hardware) is required. Lead free solders do not wet as well as SnPb solders. To improve solderability, an operator may increase the solder tip temperature or use a more active solder flux. Increasing the solder tip temperature may damage the hardware if done indiscriminately. If a more active flux is used, more aggressive cleaning processes will be required. Active fluxes leave residues on hardware, which will promote dendritic growth and poor adhesion of conformal coating.
Despite the variations between lead free and lead-based hand soldering, it is possible to meet IPC Class 3 requirements. The Lead Free Component Focus Group and the JG-PP / JCAA Lead Free Soldering Program determined that it is feasible to meet IPC Class 3 requirements with respect to solder fillet quality, wetting, and solder pad coverage. The EMPF offers a lead free soldering training course to all who are interested in developing and implementing lead free soldering processes. Lead free hand soldering, wave soldering, SMT reflow soldering, rework and repair, and inspection are all demonstrated to participants in this hands-on course. Please contact the EMPF Helpline at (610) 362-1320 for further information.
|
||
| The American Competitiveness Institute - - www.aciusa.org - - (610)362-1200 |