![]() |
| A publication of the National Electronics Manufacturing Center of Excellence | March 2005 |
Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) is a process to determine the reliability of an electronic component or assembly to a given standard or end-use requirement making it an integral design tool during the development phase. This process can be used to take the product to failure to determine how well the product performs under extreme conditions. For example, the reliability of solder joints can be tested using mechanical shock testing, one of many ESS processes. Mechanical shock is part of an ESS test plan that has great impact on solder joints, where failure can be critical. Mechanical shock testing simulates the sudden applied force or change of movement through handling, shipment, and field use. Some effects of mechanical shock are: 1) components detached from the printed circuit board; 2) cracks in the solder joints; and 3) multi-leaded component leads detached.
1. Mounting Payload allowance Size limit
Thickness of the fixture Material for the fixtures Number of boards and positioning of multiple boards |
|
Support of the boards Follow the specified torque setting for the type of screw and bolt used. Refer to Machinery’s Handbook Guide or torque chart for screw, bolts and nuts. The depth of the tapped hole and length of the screw or bolt aids in the prevention of screws and bolts flying off during the testing. 2. Cable Some data collection systems generally are supplied with cables but may not comply with the rigorous conditions of mechanical shock testing. This compliance should also be a concern when purchasing cable assemblies. These cables should be thoroughly inspected for any flaws that may hinder the data collection. If hand assembling the cables, the following should be considered:
Not all commercial off the shelf connectors will be suitable for mechanical shock testing. Choosing the connector that meets the acceptance criteria of IPC-A-610 and/or IPC-WHMA-A-620 should allow the cable assembly to conform to the test conditions. Another consideration for data capture assurance is the mounting and securing of cables. The fixture should be designed not only for the boards but also for the cables used in testing. The positioning of the cables should be placed so that they do not lie on the boards or brush against the boards. Ideally, the cables should lie parallel to the edge of the board and have a space between the edge and the cable. Securing the cable should allow little or no movement at the connectors, unless the test also requires the evaluation of the connector and cable. Securing the cable at the edge of the fixture should not add more weight or mass to the boards and fixtures. This will also limit the movement of the cable to the edge of the Conclusion |
|
| The American Competitiveness Institute - - www.aciusa.org - - (610)362-1200 |